Elephants and Other Wildlife Rely on the World's Protected Areas HuffPost
my teacher suggest me to write following way of opinion type of task 2 essay. Introduction. *general statement (rephrase topic) *opinion sentence 1. (Wild animals have no place in the 21st century) *opinion sentence 2. (so protecting them is a waste of resources) *Thesis statement (in this essay, i will discuss some arguments for and against.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources
"Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.. Moreover, recent research evidences show that some wild animals have skills that can complement our lives. For example, dogs can smell passengers to detect illegal items. Therefore, interfering with animals' ecosystems will have adverse effects.
Wild Animals Have No Place in Our Arms
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? #animals #place #st #century #waste #resources. Some people argue that spending money on the protection of wild . animals. is pointless. I completely disagree with .
Wild Animals Have No Place in Our Arms
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?. produce leather goods with wild animal skin and fur. Crocodiles, foxes, and kangaroos have all been used to make different products that can make the fashion .
SAI IELTS Essays With Sample Answers Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them. Tags. essay band 9. IELTS Essays. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century, so Protecting Them Is a Waste of Resources
Sample 3 Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century, so Protecting Them Is a Waste of Resources. Undoubtedly, wildlife is a precious gift of god to this planet. However, it is believed by some individuals that there is no need to protect wildlife by making efforts because, in the 21st century, land is scarce due to industrialisation.
Wild Animals Start Roaming Quarantined Cities As People Lock Themselves Indoors
Disagree. 1. Importance of wildlife to maintain natural balance. 2. Benefit of creating resource to protect wildlife. -----------------------. These days the wild life is at greater risk of extinction and it is predicated that this may disappear in 21st century. It has been disagreed that preserving wild animal is waste of resources.
BE the voice for those who have no voice! Floresta amazonica animais, Animais, Bicho de estimação
The length of time Japanese residents spend (on) cycling to work far outweighs British cycling commuters. Many thanks! wild animals have no place in 21st century,so protecting them is a waste of resources. It is true that animals are a part of ecosystem which are useful to the mankind in immense ways.
4 Amazing Animal Sanctuaries Who Need Your Help to Continue Saving Animals Animals Are Better
Sample 2: Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century In this contemporary era, wild beasts have no space to Live, and giving them protection is based on money and time. This essay will highlight that this certainly is a rational approach that needs to be obtained from disagreeing sides, thus leading to a logical conclusion.
Wild Animals Have No Place in The 21st Century IELTS Plaza
In the recent times,natural environment have been explored to enable development. Thereby promoting the protection of wildlife. It is a debated issue whether these wild animals have no place in the 21st century and also
Around the World, Wild Animals Appearing on City Streets BrokeAss Stuart's Website
These days, preservation problems have been becoming necessary significantly all the world while the wildlife has been gradually disappeared due to over-exploitation. Scientists demonstrated that wild animal is important to human beings so humans should save them and their habitats to escape extinction | Band: 5
Essay 22 Wild animals Cô Quỳnh IELTS IELTS Learning, IELTS Tests, IELTS Books
Several people have asked me to work through the question below (which I mentioned in a lesson last month). Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The first step is to decide whether we agree, disagree or partly agree. My preference would be to 'completely disagree'. I don't think we can partly agree.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources
In my opinion, it is absurd argue that wild animals have no place in 21st century. First, they are many questions that pose related to this issue, for example what happened these days that this thought come to their mind? Next, earth planet was not created only for us humans. All creatures such as wild animal have a right to live here. so, none.
PTE Important Essay Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them. Submitted by thao_yasay on Tue Aug 20 2019 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.
Wild animals have no place in our arms Ethos and Empathy
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The rate at which wildlife existence is being endangered is highly unprecedented in present times. As a result, there is a contentious argument over whether protecting wildlife is an absolute waste of time, energy and money.
50 best ideas for coloring Wild Cattle Species
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (266 Words, 13 Sentences, 4 Paragraphs, Band 9) Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them.